Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen Embedded V2546
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-14900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Average FPS
203
84%
Min 1% FPS
139
84%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
243
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$418.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.95 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Radeon Graphics 384SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
