In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V2546
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Nov 10, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
209 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
99%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.95 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546 Nov 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Graphics 384SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
