In Deathloop, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V2546
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 10, 2020
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Average FPS
220 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
96%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.95 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546 Nov 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 10th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Graphics 384SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
