In Deathloop, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
91%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
