In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
200 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
82%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
