In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is slower than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
199 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
81%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
