In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
199 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
92%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
