In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is slightly faster than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 96 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 45 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Celeron G4900
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer – Apr 03, 2018 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Celeron G4900: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
96 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
93 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
94%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1756B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
