In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 15, 2025 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
200 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
81%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 15th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Jan 15th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1851 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
