The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-14900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i9-14900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
192
79%
Min 1% FPS
132
80%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
243
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zen | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
