In The Callisto Protocol, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 47% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 165 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 47% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
112 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
67%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
