In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 23 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 3 years and 23 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
200 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
88%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
