In Deathloop, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
95%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$241.27
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
