In The Callisto Protocol, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is slightly faster than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Up to 7% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 112 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 15 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Celeron G4900
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer – Apr 03, 2018 vs Feb 21, 2018
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Celeron G4900: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
112 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
80 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
105 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
92%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 21st, 2018 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
