In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the Ryzen Embedded R1606G is much slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 462% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 146 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 462% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
146 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
8 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1606G Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1851 |
25W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
