Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core i5-14600KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen Embedded R1606G
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-14600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
190
81%
Min 1% FPS
131
82%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
236
100%
Min 1% FPS
160
100%
Price, $
$212.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core i5-14600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core i5-14600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1606G | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $294.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
