In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
194 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
79%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1851 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
