In Deathloop, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
52%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
