In Control, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Is 10 months and 3 days newer – Feb 25, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 10 months and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
246 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
