In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slower than the Core i7-13700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
196 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
57%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
