In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
194 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
81%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
