In Hunt: Showdown, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Feb 25, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in Hunt: Showdown – 359 vs 354 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Hunt: Showdown
Hunt: Showdown FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
354 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
218 FPS
97%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
359 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
225 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 25th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
25W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
