In Deathloop, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 25, 2020
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1600 Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
