In The Last of Us Part II, the Ryzen Embedded R1505G is slightly slower than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Feb 25, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 25 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Celeron G3930
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded R1505G vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
188 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
95%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1505G Feb 25th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 25th, 2020 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
25 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
