The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $565.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Up to 78% cheaper – $159.00 vs $724.00
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i3-3210 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, $
$724
21%
Value, $/FPS
$3.3/FPS
28%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i3-3210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $699.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
