In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 7950X is much faster than the Celeron G3900. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $578 more expensive!
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 111% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer
Celeron G3900
- Up to 92% cheaper – $47.57 vs $625.59
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.77 vs $4.84/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 51 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 7950X vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$625.59
7%
Value, $/FPS
$4.84/FPS
16%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
61 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
47%
Price, $
$47.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7950X vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7950X vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $699.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 170W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
