In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 6900HX is quite a bit faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 45 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
76 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
78%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX Jan 13th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 13th, 2022 | Released | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP7 | Socket | SP3r2 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon 680M | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
