The Ryzen 9 6900HS is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-13700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 6900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-13700
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Core i7-13700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 6900HS
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
195
92%
Min 1% FPS
129
92%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
213
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$319.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Core i7-13700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HS
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
94%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HS | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $384.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Raptor Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.1 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
