In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 5900X is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-7820X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $174 cheaper!
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 39% cheaper – $269.00 vs $443.02
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.58 vs $5.60/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 105 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Core i7-7820X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-7820X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
79 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
76%
Price, $
$443.02
60%
Value, $/FPS
$5.6/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-7820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-7820X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
11 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7820X Jun 26th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 5th, 2020 | Released | Jun 26th, 2017 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA2066 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
