Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1954 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Core i7-6700 - 71 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $118.21 vs $285.04
- Up to 47% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 5900X - $2.11 vs $4.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $285.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
56
79%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |