In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-12700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-12700F
- Up to 36% faster in Battlefield 6 – 110 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 07, 2020
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-12700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
110 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
82 FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mar 7th, 2020
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 4900HS Mar 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 7th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $324.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
