In Deathloop, the Ryzen 9 3900XT is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $87 more expensive!
Ryzen 9 3900XT
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 239 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 07, 2020
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 22% cheaper – $302.97 vs $389.99
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Deathloop – $1.26 vs $1.74/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
94%
Price, $
$389.99
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
72%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
52%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900XT Jul 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
