Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 911 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $325.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400F - $1.32 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 254 vs 246 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
246
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$325
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.54/FPS
37%
Price, $
$899.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |