In Atomfall, the Ryzen 9 3900XT is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $293 more expensive!
Ryzen 9 3900XT
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 07, 2020
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 75% cheaper – $96.99 vs $389.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 58 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
96%
Price, $
$389.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
23%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900XT Jul 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
