The Ryzen 9 3900X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $247.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 71% cheaper – $102.02 vs $350.00
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3900X vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
211
100%
Min 1% FPS
146
100%
Price, $
$350
29%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
33%
Ryzen 9 3900X vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
105 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
