The Ryzen 9 3900X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-7400T, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $300.44 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Up to 82% cheaper – $64.56 vs $365.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 35 vs 105 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 9 3900X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-7400T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
178
93%
Min 1% FPS
119
94%
Price, $
$64.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-7400T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
65%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$499.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
105 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |