The Ryzen 7 7700X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G640, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $244.21 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 7700X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G640
- Up to 89% cheaper – $29.55 vs $273.76
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
Ryzen 7 7700X vs Pentium G640 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, $
$273.76
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
14%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
76%
Min 1% FPS
112
77%
Price, $
$29.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 7700X vs Pentium G640 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 7700X vs Pentium G640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 7700X vs Pentium G640 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 7700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
$399.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Raphael | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
32 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |