The Ryzen 7 2700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8300 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $69.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Up to 40% cheaper – $106.06 vs $176.00
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 2700 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 7 2700 vs FX-8300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$176
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
65%
Ryzen 7 2700 vs FX-8300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$299.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |