In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 2700 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $462 cheaper!
Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 83% cheaper – $97.92 vs $559.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.37 vs $4.30/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 83% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 83% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
71 FPS
55%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
54%
Price, $
$97.92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 Apr 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
