In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 2700 is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
71 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
78%
Price, $
$97.92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 Apr 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
