The Ryzen 7 1700X is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $46.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-9300
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 24% cheaper – $149.00 vs $195.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 62 vs 95 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 1700X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-9300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9300
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-9300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-9300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-9300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-9300
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $143.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 62 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |