The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-8600T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-8600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs Core i5-8600T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Jun 13th, 2023
Average FPS
212
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-8600T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
183
86%
Min 1% FPS
122
87%
Price, $
$122.54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs Core i5-8600T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs Core i5-8600T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs Core i5-8600T in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Jun 13th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Core i5-8600T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
28%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8600T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 13th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $213.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
32 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |