The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $80.61 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-6700
- Up to 43% cheaper – $106.89 vs $187.50
- A better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i7-6700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$187.5
57%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
59%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
184
97%
Min 1% FPS
122
98%
Price, $
$106.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i7-6700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.701 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |