The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-8400, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $101.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-8400
- Up to 54% cheaper – $85.56 vs $187.50
- A better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i5-8400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$187.5
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
46%
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
185
98%
Min 1% FPS
123
98%
Price, $
$85.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i5-8400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i5-8400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Core i5-8400 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.701 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |