Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 138 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $74.38 vs $202.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.61 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
41%
Price, $
$202.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 7600X | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |