In The Last of Us Part II, the Ryzen 5 7600 is slightly slower than the FX-8300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $143 more expensive!
Ryzen 5 7600
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $46.90 vs $189.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 7600 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$189.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
21%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 7600 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 7600 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 7600 Jan 14th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 14th, 2023 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $229.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM5 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Radeon Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
