In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 6600H is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 6600H
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 45% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 45% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 months and 13 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 13, 2022
- Is 8 months and 13 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 6600H vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 6600H vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 6600H vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 6600H
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 6600H Jan 13th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 13th, 2022 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP7 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon 660M | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
