The Ryzen 5 3400G is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700T and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $0.27 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 0% cheaper – $99.73 vs $100.00
Advantages of the Core i7-7700T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-7700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
98%
Min 1% FPS
120
99%
Price, $
$99.73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
98%
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$100
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-7700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-7700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-7700T in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
