The Ryzen 5 2600 is the same performance gaming CPU as the Xeon E5-2699A v4, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $1760.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 93% cheaper – $140.00 vs $1900.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 65 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 44 vs 12 threads
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$1900
7%
Value, $/FPS
$10.49/FPS
7%
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
27%
L3 Cache
16 MB
29%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 2600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 22 |
12 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |