Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $140.00 vs $574.75
- Up to 72% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900 - $1.16 vs $4.20 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 2600 - 137 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1342 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |